failed border patrol test: radioactive chems slipped in

Who's making a difference, and who would you like to see more of, and who just needs to get a clue? Who's part of problem or solution for everyone as a whole?
Forum rules
Spam is not allowed, nor tolerated.
Post Reply
Hmph
Posts: 5551
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 12:32 am

failed border patrol test: radioactive chems slipped in

Post by Hmph »

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/03/27/radioa ... index.html

another factor that isn't adding up to match the "we're fighting over there so we don't have to fight over here". :scratch:
Government investigators smuggled radioactive materials into U.S.

From David de Sola
CNN

Monday, March 27, 2006; Posted: 7:55 p.m. EST (00:55 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two teams of government investigators using fake documents were able to enter the United States with enough radioactive sources to make two dirty bombs, according to a federal report made available Monday.

The investigators purchased a "small quantity" of radioactive materials from a commercial source while posing as employees of a fictitious company and brought the materials into the United States through checkpoints on the northern and southern borders, according to a Government Accountability Office report prepared for Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Norm Coleman, a Minnesota Republican.

"It's just an indictment of the system that it's easier to get radiological material than it is to get cold medicine," said a senior subcommittee staffer about the findings.

The report, along with two others by the GAO on the subject of smuggling and detection of nuclear materials, were provided to reporters by congressional sources in advance of the first of two hearings by the subcommittee scheduled to begin Tuesday.

The focus will be on what the federal government has done to protect the country against nuclear terrorism. This week's hearings come after almost three years of bipartisan and bicameral investigations into the subject.

A second GAO report notes that while the departments of State, Energy and Defense have provided radiation-detection equipment to 36 countries since 1994 to combat nuclear smuggling, operating the equipment has proven challenging.

Those challenges include technical limitations of some of the equipment, a lack of supporting infrastructure at some border sites and corruption of some foreign border security officials.

The report also notes that the State Department, the lead interagency coordinator in this effort, has not maintained a master list of U.S.-funded radiation-detection equipment in foreign countries.

Without such a list, program managers at the agencies involved "cannot accurately assess if equipment is operational and being used as intended; determine the equipment needs of countries where they plan to provide assistance; or detect if an agency has unknowingly supplied duplicative equipment," the report says.

It further criticizes the State Department, saying that "without taking steps to ensure that all previously provided radiation-detection equipment, specifically hand-held equipment, is adequately maintained and remains operational, State cannot ensure the continued effectiveness or long-term sustainability of this equipment."

A third GAO report observes that, while the Department of Homeland Security has made progress in deploying radiation-detection equipment at U.S. ports -- which include 670 portal monitors and more than 19,000 pieces of hand-held radiation detection equipment as of last December -- the agency's program goals are "unrealistic" and its cost estimate is "uncertain."

GAO's analysis concluded that the program may exceed its budget by $342 million.

David McIntyre, a spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told CNN that the agency disagreed with the GAO over the risk significance of the materials taken across the border, but then said he didn't know what materials were involved.

The NRC ranks radioactive materials by order of their security significance, such as radioactivity, dispersability and how attractive they might be to terrorists.

On the issue of the fake NRC documents downloaded from the Internet and doctored by the GAO investigators to get their shipment past border officials, McIntyre said, "We are concerned about their ability to counterfeit an NRC document, and we are taking steps to address that."

The steps include finding ways to make NRC documents more difficult to counterfeit and working with customs officials if they need information about NRC licenses or licensees.
Last edited by Hmph on Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
---
The truth shall make you free. Well F that! Pay me!
MsNikaPooh
Posts: 328
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:50 pm

Post by MsNikaPooh »

This and all the tunnels they are finding from Mexico to here really worries me. And the ports I was in Savannah this weekend past and there was no way they could check all of the crates and shipments that are coming in. Time for the government to get real and stop spending so much over there and put it where it is really needed.
NEVER EVER make someone or anything a priority when you are only an option.

Life will only be what you make it. Make it hard you get hard. Make it soft and you gets nowhere.
Nana


Vote Michelle Obama for First Lady!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Silly Wabbit
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 2:36 pm

Post by Silly Wabbit »

I heard about this. This was beyond jacked up. But the discovery of the tunnel from Mexico was more than outrageous.
--
Ask me how I feel about Mondays. Please have wine & sedatives ready.
KingFo1
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 12:55 am

Post by KingFo1 »

Yep...more signs that we're wasting our time over there and not beefing up security over here like we should've done FOUR YEARS AGO!!!
I'm a leader, not a follower
Post Reply