I'm glad I read the information. Listen, I cannot believe that after all you went through, that they didn't offer some sort of compensation for your losses. That also would have allowed them to engage in a confidentiality agreement, for which you have none with them and are free to disclose anything about them. And you've kept everything well documented. I especially loved reading their statements to Zurich, probably made over drinks, and then the complete opposite statements to Delanie Friarson.
And to think they think believe they will be successful by screwing over people is absolutely amazing. What I can't believe is that unsuspecting customers are buying their products, knowing how they feel about their customers and how they hate successful consumer software release processes. That Julia woman sounds like a spoiled brat who instigated a lot, and could care less about customers, other than "send us money to let us do what we want".
And I've noticed they're now going with a new name of lifekeeper to step away from their previous negative behaviors. I'm guessing to reinvent themselves to deceive others. Probably why they're exclusively staying overseas as that market wouldn't be as informed of their continual deceitful behaviors and coverups.
Would you be interested in speaking at one of our seminars? I'm sure customers interested in what happens before purchasing a consumer software would find this information of value. I'd also like to feature some of the SteelEye articles and information in our next issue.
By the way, did Rindy or James ever provide you with a copy of that fictitious lawsuit?
Sad, but even sadder is investors are handing over more money to this no-win situation.