the "victim" is back

Post by **Laurie** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:18 pm

Vinnie wrote:That is 1 psycho hose beast. :omg: She may come back n kill us all.

Don't tempt her, I'm careful to who I open the door to.

If she comes here to harm me, I'll

her and get the demons out of her.

Post by **Hmph** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:48 pm

I don't know, can you scare the demons outta Jason Vhorees, JGirl's twin? he can't be killed either. some director will always bring him back to life. and something will haul her back here for more "poor me" nonsense while she's spewing out the venom.

Post by **Hmph** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:49 pm

thewiseonecommeth wrote:I would challenge her to an intelligent debate and have her bring her poem back online to let others view and see what their thoughts are, so she can see for herself that your comments and thoughts were not as one sided as she, and her other personalities, think they were. However I highly doubt she would take me up on the challenge, and it would be a very one sided debate. Me with proofs, facts, and opinions from others, and her with only her own self serving responses.

she claims she only came back because she got a topic reply notification (something she set, but I had to remove because she's not bright enough!) so you may have to challenge her directly: Bonnie019@rcn.com

thewiseonecommeth · Post by **thewiseonecommeth** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:44 am

Too hilarious!

Yeah SURE she got a notification from someone about one of the topics. Sounds like she either:

a. had auto notify on for the topic in debate.

OR

b. was looking for an excuse to stick her two cents in, since she was going through drama withdrawals in her personal life.

Not even worth my time to email her. Next thing you know she will start sending me her self serving messages daily, or telling me how she wants to rip MY head off this time...lol.

If she actually comes back around again, which she will in time, then I will challenge her to a debate before she gets scarce again.

She / he will be sitting around one night, noone online to chat with, banned from every reputable forum, her kids in bed...or taken from her by the state for being such a "winner of a mother"...drunk, and decide to come back here to read some of our posts. She will get upset, and start one of her drunk ass rants again.

You know she never said she was a drinker, but from experiences I have had with alcoholic friends and a family member before...she fits the bill with her massive mood swings, violent reactions...one sided self victimizing mentality. Then the following day she is fine like nothing ever happened, until one of us bring it up to her again and she FREAKS out like we were never supposed to mention it again.

That's just my educated guess

.

Post by **Hmph** » Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:20 am

yeah but remember, she's a straight shooter and person w/integrity according to Mom-me

but I find it disturbing that she has kids

but she'll be back, you're right. drama can't escape her because the need to play the victim outweighs doing something more positive.

Post by **Laurie** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:22 am

T-Boo wrote: yeah but remember, she's a straight shooter and person w/integrity according to Mom-me

but I find it disturbing that she has kids but she'll be back, you're right. drama can't escape her because the need to play the victim outweighs doing something more positive.

I find it very disturbing also, poor children, being raised with a moral-less, dishonest and evil woman.

She needs to take her pills like prescribed, geez....

Post by **Hmph** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:38 pm

yeah but I still don't believe she's a woman or that she has kids. and if she does, you're right, god help them. she's seriously ill and definitely on that good stuff.

and if she's a woman, she's a very very insecure one. secure women don't have to go around making up insults to other women to make themselves feel better. she lost about 100 sane points for each insult which was waaaaay off. (although I did get quite a few laughs

hearing them. maybe I should give her a couple of positives for the great chuckles)

Post by **Laurie** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:44 pm

T-Boo wrote:yeah but I still don't believe she's a woman or that she has kids. and if she does, you're right, god help them. she's seriously ill and definitely on that good stuff.

and if she's a woman, she's a very very insecure one. secure women don't have to go around making up insults to other women to make themselves feel better. she lost about 100 sane points for each insult which was waaaaay off. (although I did get quite a few laughs hearing them. maybe I should give her a couple of positives for the great chuckles)

hey, don't give her applaud

:omg: or I'll whip YOUR azz.

She reminds me of gregglobe.

Post by **Hmph** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:09 pm

chile she probably IS gregglobe. at this point, given "it" is nameless and faceless, "it" could be anyone. pathetic huh?

Post by **Laurie** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:14 pm

T-Boo wrote:chile she probably IS gregglobe. at this point, given "it" is nameless and faceless, "it" could be anyone. pathetic huh?

yup, totally pathetic and I also think "they" are the same.